Sujet :

Burning, slowly burning Koran...

PizzaMan
   Posté le 08-09-2010 à 18:53:50   

Moi le 11 septembre, je brûle le Coran! Et toi ?

À l'appel du Pasteur Terry Jones, vous êtes invités à brûler un exemplaire du Coran le 11 septembre prochain, à la mémoire des victimes de l'attentat terroriste survenu en 2001.

TaoTheKing
   Posté le 08-09-2010 à 19:23:07   

Sois gentil, mets ta photo en train de le faire...

De face, et qu'on te reconnaisse bien.

Homme brave.
Atil
   Posté le 08-09-2010 à 19:47:17   

Ca coute cher un Coran ?
TaoTheKing
   Posté le 08-09-2010 à 19:58:19   

Atil a écrit :

Ca coute cher un Coran ?


Cherche bien... je suis sur que tu en as un quelque part...
Atil
   Posté le 08-09-2010 à 20:44:53   

j'en ai un ... mùais si je le brûle, comment ferais-je pour trouver des passages haineux à recopier sur le Net ?
TaoTheKing
   Posté le 08-09-2010 à 20:48:42   

Atil a écrit :

j'en ai un ... mùais si je le brûle, comment ferais-je pour trouver des passages haineux à recopier sur le Net ?


martiko
   Posté le 08-09-2010 à 21:17:58   

TaoTheKing a écrit :

Sois gentil, mets ta photo en train de le faire...

De face, et qu'on te reconnaisse bien.

Homme brave.


non! pitié pas ça!!
martiko
   Posté le 08-09-2010 à 21:24:55   

le coran pourrait se fabriquer en rouleaux de prières qu l'on pourrait lire pour se faire chier dans les toilettes ensuite utiliser pour se ...(hygiéne corporelle) ....le cul.
Ca faudrait que je le fesse breveter!
Atil
   Posté le 08-09-2010 à 21:46:21   

On vient d'apprendre qu'un avion détourné se dirige vers ta maison ..
TaoTheKing
   Posté le 08-09-2010 à 21:51:14   

Avec à son bord des terroristes entraînés aux USA?
Atil
   Posté le 09-09-2010 à 14:50:05   

On a droit à combien d'Occidentaux tués dans des attentats avant de décider que brûler des Coran n'était pas une bonne idée ?
Parceque n'oublions pas qu'il y aura des représailles.
TaoTheKing
   Posté le 10-09-2010 à 12:51:21   

Pourquoi ne réponds tu pas à ma question sur l'entrainement, et pourquoi pas parlons-en le financement du terrorisme?
Atil
   Posté le 11-09-2010 à 09:00:32   

J'ai recu cet email...
Vous pensez que c'est le pasteur brûleur de Corans qui continue sa campagne anti-musulmans ?



The six years old wife of Mohammed

In the age of fifty years Mohammed married a six years old girl (Aisha bint Abu Bakr), the apostle of the Islam started to sexually abuse the child when it was nine years old. Aisha was the daughter of Abu Bakr and one day when Mohammed visited Abu Bakr's house, he got to know her. Aisha was a cheerful, liveliest small girl and Mohammed was very impressed of her kind, so he started joking with her . . . Sahih Bukhari 7,62,64: Aisha told that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death) (1). Mohammed was a friend of slavery and was caught by one of his many wifes, when he had sexual intercourse with his slave Maria al-Qibtiyya (Maria herself was a present of someone). Promptly the suitable Quran Verse was send down to Mohammed and at once it was OK to deceive his wives. The messenger of the Islam also allowed the genital mutilation of the woman, so that it became an Islamic ritual until today and he even tried to defend prostitution and pimping (the holy Quran 24:33): "If your slave girls desire to keep chaste, you shall not force them to prostitution. And whoever forces them, then Allah, seeing that they are forced, surely is Forgiving, Merciful."

Muslim 8,3371: Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa'id al Khadri: 0 Abu Sa'id, did you hear Allah's Messenger mentioning al-'azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah's Messenger on the expedition to the Bi'l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wifes, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them . . . But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah's Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah's Messenger, and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born (1). Muslim 8,3432: Abu Sa'id al-Khudri reported that at the Battle of Hanain Allah's Messenger sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah's Messenger seemed to refrain from having sexual intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, sent down regarding that: "And all married women (are forbidden unto you), except those whom your right hands possess" (Quran Sure 4:24). This means that Mohammed, the apostle of the Islam, and his friends have raped defenseless, married women and that Mohammed really tried to justify this through religion (1)! Rape of married women, child abuse through an over fifty years old man and a live full of blood, fear, violence, oppression, massmurder, dispossession and slavery, Mohammed surly had also many good ideas, but of course he wasn't one of the holy messengers of God, it never has given a need for five Islamic prayers a day, for Ramadan, to wear a headscarf . . .

There are two different opinions regarding to the emergence of this world, some people think, that this world with all live and all events would be a tiny part of the logical causal chain which started with the big bang, the others are convinced of it, that it is finally the fault of Adam and Eve because they have not observed the one holy law of God: "When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her . . ." According to the religious view the big bang is a willfully deception of God, a scientific explanation for the emergence of this world which was given, because without the doubt in God, it wouldn't be possible to test the faith and unbelief of mankind and the sense of this world would get lost. On the other hand, a causal chain out of cause and effect can not have a beginning respectively emerge out of nothing, this contradicts to the laws of science, therewith there's not only no cause before or for the big bang, but also no energy which would have been necessary for the big bang, even not a tiny disbalance between anything. If two fingers are pressed together, is nothing between them or rather no matter, thrust therein that the universe, the human himself and the bright world which surrounds the human not emerged out of the completely harmless nothing between two fingers or without God, this is simply an imagination which was invented by some humans and which is finally impossible. In the first states of the USA such stories were deleted already successfully from the curriculum, so that they weren't taught any more to the children in the schools. Depriving children of their faith is a serious crime, it's in the hands of our generation to stop the systematic and unfair education of many million children to the unbelieve!

If the big bang could have happened without God, practically everything could have emerged out of this, but this universe was build exactly so, that the suppositions for live are given, for example without voltage no brainwaves could flow, without radiation this world would be dark and ice-cold, without atoms and the possibility to build molecules live would be impossible, the same would be without many other chemical properties and reactions or without elements like oxygen or carbon or hydrogen or . . ., also the lost of continuity or time or space or matter or the three states of matter or movement or physical or chemical energy or different agencies or . . . would make live finally impossible. Without intelligence something absolute senseless would have emerged out of the big bang or out of nothing, but of course no live. Yes, the frightening recognition is, that the universe was constructed deliberately exactly so, that the suppositions for live and higher live are given!

For the alleged chemical evolution of live, a first living and survivable unicellular organism would have been necessary, but a just 10 µm large cell, a very complex, perfectly compound, three-dimensional puzzle or a survivable machine out of at least 10 quadrillion pieces (16 g/mol), atoms of different kind and attribute, impossibly could be washed together in an unrealistic puddle out of cytoplasm, be bound together in the same second by many different chemical processes into a flexible unit and get enliven also in the same moment, to start to breathe, to eat, to grow . . . and to produce randomly complete and living self-copies, which will grow up some day to intelligent structured humans. If we are honest we must admit, that even not only one single dead DNA strand could be washed together in a liquid. Already the DNA strands of the first survivable cell must randomly have conformed exactly to the cell construction, beside this DNA strands are written in a very high programming language, until today nobody can understand how or by which encoding systems this codes get transcribed into commands, movements and material constructions. For the DNA strands and for every of the different cell organelles of the first survivable cell must also have been directly there the belonging to copysystems or already the first cell division would have been impossible, the human even wouldn't be able to build the technology of only one material system which could copy itself, try to build a computer which could copy itself!

The functions of cells partially happen on the molecular and atomic level, if the dateless old atoms, out of which we and the cells are set together, would be as big as table tennis balls, an average human brain with 1250 to 1375 g would take in a little bit more space than the whole planet earth with its diameter of 12700 km (13,5 g/mol, the volume of a table tennis ball is 33,5 cm^3), it's a wonder that a grown thinking machine of such complexity ever could work without going defect. If the 10 quadrillion atoms of a 10 µm large unicellular organism would be as big as table tennis balls, this unicellular organism would take in the whole city Tokyo by a hight of more than 500 meters. If God would build a machine out of 10 quadrillion atoms of different kind and attribute, this machine wouldn't die any more after its commissioning, because it really would start to breathe, to eat, to grow, to move . . . to survive independently in its world and to divide itself many trillion times, to conquer the planet and to travel to the moon. If God would construct a machine with such properties, it would be so small, that we even couldn't see it with our multicellular eyes. We have got no idea about the intelligence of God, the creator out of nothing, but surly it's not grateful to use the by God constructed brain to say, that a dirty puddle was the inventor of live.

A just 10 µm large unicellular organism is a very complex, perfectly compound, three-dimensional puzzle out of at least 10 quadrillion pieces of different kind and attribute, but a chemical evolution even wouldn't be able to wash correctly together a DNA string or a two-dimensional computer program character string out of 1000 signs, which is written with only 10 different letters, because with every sign, which will be attached after the first sign, the probability that the program was written correctly sinks by the factor 10, so the probability that a computer program out of 1000 signs will be written correctly by random or will be washed together in a dirty puddle is 10^1000 (a 1 with one thousand 0). In contrast to this, today we know, that the whole universe contains less than 10^100 atoms totally and that it is less than 10^18 seconds old. If the universe would be 100 times smaller or younger, the chance that the chemical evolution really happened would be 100 times less, if the 1000 sign computer program would be 100 times shorter, the chance that the chemical evolution really happened would be 100 times bigger, so we can stroke out the zeros: 10^1000 - 10^100 - 10^18 = 10^882. We have reduced the whole universe to one atom and an age of one second through only 118 letters! So the iron proof for the absolute impossibility of a chemical evolution was written down!

A long time ago was created a world which seems to be produced and controlled by random and in which we can decide without the fear of God, so it would be good to decide just like Jesus would have done (1,2). Even if this world seems to be produced and controlled by random, Jesus told us that God decides about everything, even on which side a coin will fall or when a bird will die. Jesus said that whatever a man sows, this he will also reap, so the good and the bad that we effect, in any way will also be our own destiny. Jesus let dry up a fig tree, totally to waive sugar is the secret of a very high intelligence and the Islamic countries where sweets are eaten nearly every day never had gone rich, even if they have much oil. As Jesus teached us, the good that we can reach for God in this world, will be our own richness in the eternal Paradise. The live in this world seems to be real and its existence is also only a wonder, so are we the causal chain out of nothing, a network in the dark which thinks about itself and starts to believe in God or are we made by an insidious and everything-observing intelligence? Some humans will be happy for 100 years and some will be sad for 100 years, but when this life ends the eternity will begin, so why to life for a worthless dust particle when it comes about the entire universe.


This chain letter was sent to millions of people worldwide and can also be published or forwarded.

This email was sent over an anonym remailer string and can't be answered.
TaoTheKing
   Posté le 11-09-2010 à 09:47:36   

Désolé, nous sommes en France.
Notre identité nationale est composé d'une langue appelée le français.
Si tu souhaites que ce message soit en accord avec l'identité nationale, il faudrait le traduire.
Atil
   Posté le 11-09-2010 à 11:24:16   

Nous sommes en France ?

Tu n'as pas vu le titre de ce topique ?
martiko
   Posté le 11-09-2010 à 14:24:07   

Atil a écrit :

On vient d'apprendre qu'un avion détourné se dirige vers ta maison ..


je m'en fous j'habite tout près d'une mosquée j'avais trop peur des terroristes!
Atil
   Posté le 12-09-2010 à 20:45:44   

Donc on devrait construire plus de mosquées.
Ca protège.
martiko
   Posté le 12-09-2010 à 23:38:43   

et puis ça remplacerait les asiles psychiatrique.